Archive for category Marijuana Issues

Feds escalate efforts to close California pot shops

Official portrait of United States Attorney Ge...

Image via Wikipedia

By John Hoeffel, Los Angeles Times

October 7, 2011

Federal prosecutors are threatening to shut down medical marijuana dispensaries throughout California, sending letters that warn landlords to stop sales of the drug within 45 days or face the possibility that their property will be seized and they will be charged with a crime.

The stepped-up enforcement escalates the Obama administration‘s efforts to rein in the spread of pot stores, which accelerated after the attorney general announced in 2009 that federal prosecutors would not target people using medical marijuana in states that allow it.

“It’s coming out of left field as far as we’re concerned,” said Joe Elford, the chief counsel for Americans for Safe Access, which advocates for medical marijuana use. “I really don’t know what inspired this. It’s a complete about-face from what [Obama] said when he was campaigning.”

The initiative, spearheaded by the four U.S. attorneys in the state, will focus on dispensaries selected by the prosecutors, said a person familiar with the operation. He declined to say what criteria would be used to target dispensaries and asked not to be identified because the prosecutors are scheduled to make the official announcement at a news conference Friday morning in Sacramento.

Landlords for some dispensaries have already received letters, including the owner of the building that houses the Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana inFairfax, Calif., the oldest dispensary in the country. “I assume the story you’re calling about is: Obama takes resources away from fighting terrorists and goes after old ladies with glaucoma,” said Greg Anton, a lawyer who represents the dispensary.

The letter to the Marin Alliance notes that the dispensary is within a prohibited distance of a park, raising the possibility that enforcement will zero in on stores within 1,000 feet of schools and playgrounds, a distance that can bring enhanced penalties for illegal drug sales. But letters received by dispensaries in San Diego make no mention of such prohibitions. “We’re trying to figure this out,” said Jessica C. McElfresh, who represents some dispensaries in the city. “I am surprised at the size of this. I am surprised by the vast amount of planning that has clearly gone into it.”

U.S. Atty. Andre Birotte Jr. in Los Angeles could not be reached for comment, but the source said the prosecutor would not initially focus on dispensaries in Los Angeles.

Dale Gieringer, the director of California NORML, which backs legalizing marijuana, said the approach appears to reflect the state’s regional differences. “They want to do a clean sweep in San Diego, whereas in Northern California they can’t possibly do a clean sweep,” he said. “There’s no political support for it. It would be devastating.”

The administration has also ratcheted up pressure on dispensaries by demanding back taxes and penalties after audits disqualified deductions for business expenses. Federal authorities also are leaning on banks to close accounts belonging to owners of dispensaries and telling firearms dealers they cannot sell to medical marijuana patients.

Lynnette Shaw, the owner of the Marin Alliance, said she has paid taxes since she opened her dispensary 14 years ago and was advised by the Internal Revenue Service to deduct expenses. But the IRS has audited her 2009 returns and demanded $1 million, which Shaw said is about equal to her gross revenue.

When Barack Obama was running for president, he joked about smoking marijuana and said the federal government should not interfere with medical marijuana users who follow state laws. After he took office, U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder made that stance policy.

More recently, however, the Department of Justice and some federal prosecutors have limited their tolerance. When Oakland and Berkeley made plans to allow industrial-scale pot cultivation, the U.S. attorney for the area threatened prosecution. The cities shelved plans that officials said were motivated by the desire for increased regulatory control and tax collection.

Although California was the first state to decriminalize marijuana for medical use in 1996, it remains a federal crime to possess or sell it, and the tension between state and federal laws continues to play out.

“The Obama administration, as far as medical marijuana has been concerned, really hasn’t been much different than the Bush administration,” said William G. Panzer, an Oakland lawyer who helped draft the medical marijuana initiative.

The Bush administration sent similar letters to landlords who rented to dispensaries in 2007. In Los Angeles, many dispensaries were forced from their locations, but most simply found new ones. “They succeeded in closing a handful of collectives, but nothing ever came of it,” said Don Duncan, the California director for Americans for Safe Access. “There are more open now than there were then.”

Activists said the government does not have the money or staff to force the dispensaries to close. “It’s a lot of huffing and puffing,” Elford said, “but we’ll see if they actually blow the house down.”

john.hoeffel@latimes.com

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The humane choice on Medical Marijuana

Andrew Cuomo

Image via Wikipedia

Sensible and Humane

There is no good reason to deprive patients with cancer or H.I.V. or Lou Gehrig’s disease of the relief from pain or extreme nausea that could come from using marijuana.

Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, who once opposed his state’s medical marijuana law, has changed his mind, deciding earlier this month to allow six alternative treatment centers to begin dispensing the drug to those in need, possibly by early next year. Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York needs to change his mind as well.

Governor Cuomo said during his 2010 campaign that he opposed legalization of medical marijuana. Recently, he said he was still opposed but that he was “reviewing” the issue and “we’re always learning and listening, talking and growing. We hope.” It shouldn’t take much more personal growth to make the right call.

Governor Cuomo should ask Governor Christie about how he resolved his own doubts. Mr. Christie could explain how his law is the nation’s most restrictive and how the federal Justice Department has indicated that its agents will rightly direct their energies in New Jersey to go after big-time marijuana traffickers, not doctors or alternative centers helping the desperately ill.

Under New Jersey’s law, doctors can recommend that a patient suffering from a specific disease or condition use marijuana of limited strength. Patients cannot grow their own, and they can only purchase 2 ounces every 30 days. Physicians must register to recommend the marijuana use, and patients and caregivers must undergo background checks to get ID cards.

Mr. Cuomo should champion a similar and humane system and ensure that New York’s residents coping with illness have the same chance at relief.

If you or someone you know is suffering from a medical condition and want to learn more about using marijuana as medicine, please call Dr. Roger A. Barnes at 626-344-7596 or visit www.TheCannabisDoctors.com to schedule a confidential medical marijuana evaluation.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

UCLA center Kai Maiava suspended a game for positive marijuana test

A hoodie with the University of California, Lo...

Image via Wikipedia

By Chris Foster

8:56 PM PDT, September 6, 2011

UCLA center Kai Maiava has been suspended for the San Jose State game after testing positive for marijuana, according to people in the program who were not authorized to speak on the matter.

Under UCLA’s drug policy, an athlete is suspended for the next athletic contest after testing positive for a third time. The fourth positive test results in “an immediate suspension from participation in athletics” and a loss of scholarship, according to the policy.

Last season, four UCLA players were suspended for a game after testing positive for marijuana a third time.

Coach Rick Neuheisel said, “We had to suspend Kai Maiava for this week’s game for a violation of team rules. No other comment to be made on that point.”

Maiava did individual workouts Tuesday during practice. Greg Capella took over at center with the first team.

“I broke some rules and I have to sit out San Jose State,” Maiava said about the violation. He would not comment on the specifics of the violation.

“I’m not happy about the situation, but at the same time I’m not going to sit here and cry about it,” Maiava said. “Everybody makes choices. Everybody makes mistakes. I’m a grown man now and I’m going to learn from them.”

Capella started at guard against Houston but was the team’s backup center last season and played briefly at center against Texas.

The rest of the line is in flux. Chris Ward will start at one guard. Either Sean Sheller or Albert Cid will start at the other guard. Jeff Baca, who was cleared to practice this week, could play at Sheller’s tackle spot.

Baca has made a quick recovery from a broken ankle, suffered during spring practice. He was academically ineligible for the 2010 season.

“We have a couple options,” Neuheisel said. “We have to see where Jeff Baca is with his conditioning. We have to see where Albert Cid is with his conditioning.”

Baca worked some with the first team during practice Tuesday.

“He looked good the brief time he was in there,” Neuheisel said. “He wanted more, but we’re trying to be cautious. Conditioning is the big thing. He has not played football in a long time.”

Willis enrolls

Brandon Willis, the well-traveled defensive tackle, enrolled at UCLA and was allowed to practice.

Willis, a redshirt as a freshman at UCLA in 2010, transferred to North Carolina last spring. He originally signed with the Tar Heels but transferred to UCLA last summer. He has four years of eligibility remaining.

UCLA is requesting a waiver from the NCAA that would allow Willis to play this season. If it is denied, he will have to sit out another year.

“I have no idea how quickly things like that work,” Neuheisel said. “I know we’re going to try. I think it would be a great thing for Brandon. He has sat a long time for doing nothing wrong. I think it would be a neat thing if the NCAA allowed it to happen, but that’s not up to me.”

Quick hits

Quarterback Kevin Prince sat out practice going through the concussion protocol. Neuheisel said he would practice Wednesday. … Strong safety Dietrich Riley worked out with the first team, replacing Dalton Hilliard. Defensive coordinator Joe Tresey said the two would share the position Saturday.

chris.foster@latimes.com twitter.com/cfosterlatimes

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Drug Testing the Poor: Bad Policy, Even Worse Law

"Drugwipe", a drug test for Cocaine

Image via Wikipedia

By Adam Cohen Time.com

Under a new Florida law, people applying for welfare have to take a drug test at their own expense. If they pass, they are eligible for benefits and the state reimburses them for the test. If they fail, they are denied welfare for a year, until they take another test.

Mandatory drug testing for welfare applicants is becoming a popular idea across the U.S. Many states — including Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Louisiana — are considering adopting laws like Florida’s. At the federal level, Senator David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, has introduced the Drug Free Families Act of 2011, which would require all 50 states to drug-test welfare applicants.

And the focus isn’t even limited to welfare. In July, Indiana adopted drug tests for participants in a state job-training program. An Ohio state senator, Tim Grendell, recently said he plans to introduce a bill to require the unemployed to take a drug test before they receive unemployment benefits.

Drug-testing the needy has an undeniable populist appeal. It taps into deeply held beliefs about the deserving and undeserving poor. As Alabama state representative Kerry Rich put it, “I don’t think the taxpayers should have to help fund somebody’s drug habit.”

But as government policy, drug testing is being oversold. These laws do not do what their supporters claim. And more importantly: they are likely to be unconstitutional.

Drug testing proponents like to argue that there are large numbers of drug users going on welfare to get money to support their habits. The claim feeds into long-standing stereotypes about the kind of people who go on welfare, but it does not appear to have much basis in fact.

Several studies, including a 1996 report from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, have found that there is no significant difference in the rate of illegal-drug use by welfare applicants and other people. Another study found that 70% of illegal-drug users between the age of 18 and 49 are employed full time.

Drug-testing laws are often touted as a way of saving tax dollars, but the facts are once again not quite as presented. Idaho recently commissioned a study of the likely financial impact of drug testing its welfare applicants. The study found that the costs were likely to exceed any money saved.

That happens to be Florida’s experience so far. A Florida television station, WFTV, reported that of the first 40 applicants tested, only two came up positive, and one of those was appealing. The state stands to save less than $240 a month if it denies benefits to the two applicants, but it had to pay $1,140 to the applicants who tested negative. The state will also have to spend considerably more to defend the policy in court.

Given that cost-benefit reality, it is hard to escape the suspicion that what is really behind the drive to drug-test benefits applicants is a desire to stigmatize the needy. The fact is, there are all sorts of people who benefit from government programs. Businessmen get state contracts, farmers receive crop subsidies and retired state workers receive pensions. The pro-drug-testing movement, however, is focusing exclusively on welfare recipients — an easy target. (Read about ER doctors testing for drugs without a patient’s consent.)

Policies like Florida’s will almost certainly end up in court — and there is a good chance that they will be struck down. The Fourth Amendment puts strict limits on what kind of searches the state can carry out, and drug tests are considered to be a search. In 1997, in Chandler v. Miller, the Supreme Court voted 8-1 to strike down a Georgia law requiring candidates for state offices to pass a drug test.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the majority, said that the drug testing was an unreasonable search. The state can impose drug tests in exceptional cases, when there is a public-safety need for them (as with bus and train operators, for instance). But the Fourth Amendment does not allow the state to diminish “personal privacy for a symbol’s sake,” the court said. (Read whether schoolteachers should be drug-tested.)

Drug testing welfare applicants does not seem to meet the Chandler test since there is no particular safety reason to be concerned about drug use by welfare recipients. In 2003, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Michigan’s drug testing of welfare applicants as a Fourth Amendment violation.

If Florida and other states are really concerned about drug use, they should adopt stricter laws and better enforcement policies aimed at the whole population, not just the most vulnerable. But these laws are not really about drug use. They are about, in these difficult economic times, making things a little harder for the poor.

Cohen, a former TIME writer and former member of the New York Times editorial board, is a lawyer who teaches at Yale Law School. Case Study, his legal column for TIME.com, appears every Monday. You can continue the discussion on TIME‘s Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pasadena man suspected of marijuana cultivation

SAFED, ISRAEL - MARCH 07:   A  cannabis plant ...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

PASADENA – Police arrested a Pasadena man Thursday after officers spotted marijuana plants growing in his back yard, authorities said.

Jerry Lee Lewis, 52, was booked on suspicion of cultivation of marijuana, Pasadena police Lt. Chris Russ said.

Officers were near his home in the 1000 block of Summit Avenue and noticed marijuana plants growing in his back yard, he said.

They inquired with the homeowner, Lewis, who admitted to illegally growing the 18 plants, the lieutenant said.

According to sheriff’s booking records, Lewis was released from jail after posting $10,000 bail.

Article originally available at http://www.sgvtribune.com/news/ci_18483613

If you have a medical condition and believe marijuana may help you, please call Roger A. Barnes MD at 626-344-7596 to schedule a confidential evaluation at our Pasadena office. Visit our website at http://www.thecannabisdoctors.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

DEA Rejects Petition to Reschedule Marijuana for Medical Use

LAS VEGAS - JULY 28:  Members of the media wai...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

By Dennis McMillan

article originally available at http://www.sfbaytimes.com/?sec=article&article_id=15443

On July 11, the White House, with little fanfare, issued its annual (and long overdue) 2011 National Drug Control Strategy Report. “As usual, the White House’s official justification for the ongoing multigenerational drug war was light on facts and heavy on rhetoric, particularly as it pertained to the federal government’s fixation with criminalizing cannabis,” said Paul Armentano, NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) Deputy Director.

And after nine years of regulatory delay, the Drug Enforcement Administration has rejected a petition by a coalition of groups including California NORML to reschedule marijuana for medical use. The response came only after advocates sued in federal court for unreasonable delay. The petition, filed in 2002 by the Cannabis Rescheduling Coalition, cited a growing body of scientific evidence plus the approval of medical marijuana in several states as grounds that marijuana qualifies as having “accepted medical use” and should be removed from Schedule One, which includes heroin and other nonmedical drugs.

The DEA countered that none of the evidence was valid since it did not meet the standard of FDA new drug application trials. The DEA cited a five-year old Department of Health and Human Services paper claiming that marijuana did not have medical use.  While referencing innumerable studies showing potential health risks of marijuana, it failed to reference any of the hundreds of studies showing medical efficacy of marijuana on the grounds that they did not meet the standard of well-controlled, large-scale, double blind FDA approval trials. However, none of the negative evidence cited by the government met that standard either.

The DEA failed to mention that it has deliberately obstructed FDA trials from taking place by denying the approval of a research-grade marijuana growing facility at the University of Massachusetts, contrary to the recommendation of its own administrative law judge. The only existing legal source of marijuana for U.S. researchers is the National Institute on Drug Abuse, which has stated that it will not pursue FDA studies of the drug for medical use.

“The government has created a Catch-22 situation, in which the DEA is free to ignore mounting scientific evidence and the experience of countless physicians and users who have found medical marijuana effective, in order to protect its bureaucratic position,” said California NORML director Dale Gieringer, who helped author the rescheduling petition. “The government’s response raises serious questions about its competence to manage Americans’ health care.”

Gieringer pointed out that surveys have shown that patients who use medical marijuana can dramatically reduce their use of other, more costly but less effective FDA-approved prescription drugs. “Yet DEA drug bureaucrats are deliberately ignoring these facts so as to protect their bloated agency,” Gieringer said.

Advocates are now planning how to challenge the DEA decision. Medical marijuana advocates are supporting a bill by Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), the State’s Medical Marijuana Protection Act of 2011(HR 1983), which would end marijuana’s Schedule One status and let states regulate its medical availability.

Under a policy recently reaffirmed by the Obama administration, the federal government has arrested, charged, threatened, and/or imprisoned hundreds of individuals in states with legal medical marijuana for violating federal laws. California NORML is calling on Congress to investigate the DEA’s malfeasance with regards to medical marijuana.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Doctor Accused Of Selling Fake Medical Marijuana Cards

OAKLAND, CA - JANUARY 28:  Different kinds of ...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Detroit – http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43613770/ns/local_news-detroit_mi/t/43614195Two people have been charged for their alleged roles in a for-profit medical marijuana operation that included the sale of fake medical marijuana physician certifications

An investigation by Clinton Township police revealed that Dr. Lois Butler-Jackson, 50, of Detroit, allegedly issued hundreds of falsified medical marijuana Physician’s Certificates that were then sold for cash by medical marijuana business partner Brian Deloose, 33, of Warren, out of the back of his Warren appliance store also advertised as the location for the so-called “Safe Access Clinic.”

“This law was intended to help a narrow group of seriously ill individuals, but criminals are exploiting it for illegal activity that puts everyone’s safety at risk,” said Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette.

To comply with state law governing medical marijuana use, patients must be certified to participate in the Medical Marihuana Program by a physician licensed to practice in Michigan. A physician must complete a full assessment of the patient’s medical history in the course of a bona-fide physician-patient relationship. A signed physician certificate is then provided to the State as part of the patient’s formal application to the program.

Deloose allegedly sold hundreds of medical marijuana registration packets, complete with the Physician Certificates pre-signed by Butler-Jackson, to prospective patients for $250 each. Butler-Jackson allegedly received a $100 payment from Deloose for each new registration packet and $50 for each renewal packet sold at the Warren appliance store.

Butler-Jackson and Deloose are facing several charges, including placing misleading/inaccurate information on medical records and possession with intent to deliver marijuana.

In a separate civil action, Butler-Jackson also faces formal disciplinary proceedings initiated by Schuette on behalf of the Bureau of Health Professions, an agency within the State Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs. Butler-Jackson is scheduled to appear at a contested case hearing before an administrative law judge on July 18. At the hearing, Butler-Jackson will respond to allegations that she violated the Public Health Code. The ultimate sanction against Butler-Jackson will be determined by the Michigan Board of Medicine.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Medical Marijuana Report Card for Obama

Cover of the second issue of Medical Marijuana...

Image via Wikipedia

Americans for Safe Access, a patient advocacy group, has issued a report card for President Obama. They gave him a failing grade for his record on medical marijuana. This report card highlights broken promises, half-measures and a general failure by the Obama Administration to address medical marijuana as a national public health issue. The report cites ongoing federal raids and accuses the government of undermining local and state medical marijuana laws. The report card also urges the Obama Administration to develop a comprehensive federal policy that truly curbs enforcement. In addition, the report card calls for expanded research and the reclassification of marijuana from its status as a dangerous drug with no medical value.

Steph Sherer, Executive Director of ASA says, “Patients are sick and tired of being marginalized and living in fear of the federal government.” “It’s time to push politics aside, recognize the plight of patients across the country, and properly address medical marijuana as the public health issue that it is.”

The actual report card can be viewed here http://americansforsafeaccess.org/downloads/Obama_Report_Card.pdf

The article from ASA can be read here http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=6371

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Millions at stake in IRS audit of Oakland medical marijuana dispensary

Harborside Health Center proclaims itself the world’s largest marijuana dispensary. For certain, it is California’s most ambitious – a holistic care center with a naturopathic physician, acupuncturist, chiropractor, yoga instructors and therapists in "universal life force energy."

Its Oakland facility handles $22 million in annual medical marijuana transactions.

Now Harborside is attracting scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service. Since last year, the IRS has been auditing 2008 and 2009 federal tax returns for the Oakland location, one of two outlets Harborside operates for 70,000 medical marijuana users. The other facility is in San Jose.

The outcome may eventually establish whether U.S. tax authorities treat medical marijuana as a legitimate enterprise or illicit drug trafficking.

IRS tax code passed during the Reagan administration to keep drug dealers from making business deductions could cost Harborside millions of dollars in tax deductions for salaries, overhead and the expenses of buying and furnishing medical pot.

Steve DeAngelo, Harborside’s director, said the IRS has been examining the nonprofit dispensary’s books for months and has informed him it is being audited for compliance with IRS code 280E, which covers rules for "expenditures in connection with the illegal sale of drugs."

While the IRS would not confirm or deny the audit, Harborside is lobbying Congress to change the code for dispensaries in states where medical marijuana is legal. Marijuana remains an illegal narcotic under federal law.

"We’re … objecting to the fact that something designed for cocaine kingpins is being applied to licensed medical cannabis facilities following state law," DeAngelo said.

He said Harborside and other California dispensaries – which currently pay more than $100 million in state sales taxes in addition to local fees – may be in peril if the IRS rigidly enforces its tax code.

Donald Heller, a former Sacramento federal prosecutor of narcotics cases, said DeAngelo has cause to worry.

"I’m sure the IRS is going to aggressively pursue this," he said. "Because, under federal law, you cannot deduct something that is illegal."

Center cites 2007 California case

Harborside is banking on the precedent of another California case, in which the IRS tried – and failed – to win a $426,000 judgment for back taxes and penalties against a San Francisco medical marijuana provider, Californians Helping to Alleviate Medical Problems Inc.

In that 2007 case, U.S. Tax Court Judge David Laro declared that the organization, known as CHAMP, was both a marijuana provider and a "caregiving" service offering counseling, food and other support for AIDS patients. He ruled that CHAMP could deduct the majority of employee costs as caregiving expenses.

In court documents, Laro said the IRS conceded that tax code 280E didn’t apply to "the costs of goods sold." CHAMP’s attorney, Matthew Kumin, said that meant its biggest expense – $575,000 for marijuana – was deductible.

He said CHAMP ended up paying a tax assessment of $4,905.

Kumin argues the IRS can go after the costs of speed boats or airplanes of drug traffickers but not marijuana at California dispensaries if the outlets document what they pay to acquire or cultivate pot for medical users.

"You can deduct the costs of the medicine so long as you show the IRS you paid for it," Kumin said.

But he said the Harborside tax probe highlights "the continuing incongruity between federal and state law" for marijuana.

Heller said the IRS is under no restrictions in auditing dispensaries, even as Attorney General Eric Holder declares the U.S. Justice Department won’t prosecute legal marijuana operations in states permitting medical use.

"He (Holder) can decide what to prosecute and not prosecute," Heller said. "On the other hand, he cannot tell the IRS how to discharge its responsibilities."

The Harborside tax probe comes as Oakland draws federal attention over a city proposal to license industrial-scale cultivation warehouses for medical marijuana. The Oakland City Council is revamping its plan after warnings it could have violated California laws governing distribution of medical marijuana and triggered federal raids.

The IRS would not discuss how it views medical marijuana. "Any official comment that is made is going to be perceived as a confirmation (of the Harborside audit)," said IRS spokesman Jesse Weller in Oakland. "That’s why we’re not going to comment."

Center seeks Congress’ help

Last November, Harborside’s chief financial officer, Luigi Zamarra, wrote U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, arguing for changes in federal tax law for medical marijuana.

"The Internal Revenue Service has begun to audit the tax returns of cannabis dispensaries that are legally operating," Zamarra wrote. He said the IRS was seeking to "disallow many ordinary and necessary business expenses. This is simply unfair."

It is unknown how many California dispensaries file federal tax returns. Under state law, they must operate as nonprofits but pay state sales taxes. Some cities, including Oakland, have imposed local pot taxes as well.

Allen Davenport, an analyst for the California Board of Equalization, said the tax agency has conducted audits of about 40 dispensaries and notified hundreds more they must have proper sellers’ permits and sales tax records.

DeAngelo, who said Harborside pays more than $2.3 million a year in state and local taxes on marijuana transactions, said there was never a question about filing federal tax returns.

"The whole idea of Harborside is to be a model of legitimacy and transparency," he said.

Heller said legal disputes over tax deductions for delivering medical marijuana may reach America’s highest court.

"I have a good idea what the Supreme Court would do," Heller said. "It would uphold the IRS code that it is an illegal deduction."

Article originally available at http://www.sacbee.com/2011/02/18/3412702/millions-at-stake-in-irs-audit.html

 

If you are a California resident and want to learn more about how to become a qualified legal patient, visit www.thecannabisdoctors.com or call us now to schedule a confidential evaluation at 626-344-7596.

Tags: , , , ,